I don’t believe in black holes. I know you’re thinking “okay? and?” Or “You’re not a physicist, how would you know?” And you’d be right, but I still have a brain..
We know black holes form after a gravitational collapse… but “Collapse” is a process, it takes time. Anything that forms because of a collapse must therefore form, basically meaning that became something through change… which takes time..
Hold that thought for a second..
At the epicenter of a nuclear explosion, matter doesn’t behave like stable “things”. Atoms can’t cleanly exist, then react, then stop existing.. they “flicker” out of definable states faster than time can measure or be able to visually show the changes over time. There’s no stable moment in time where something “is” before it’s acted on.
For “it” to be “it”, “it” must form to be “it”.
Now, take that and let’s go back to gravitational collapse. Anything pulled towards this singularity doesn’t fall as a whole, it’s stretched. The “closer” it gets towards this singularity, the more violently it’s structurally ripped apart… it breaks down before it “arrives”… it ceases to exist, since time itself breaks down..
So, a singularity is, but isn’t. Because if it is, it would’ve taken time. Time can’t exist. So this becomes a temporal collapse.
Yet.. again… for it to become, it must’ve became..
Sorry for the big boy words, but it’s the only way to explain this final conclusion..
Therefore.. a literal singularity is not a physical object, because it must become an object. All this boils down to a mathematical artifact that shows the models has exceeded its domain of validity. (See, big boy words lol)
Black holes, a complete, physical singularity forming as a true endpoint is just inconsistent.
Do you agree?